What is Normal Sexual Act is not Love? - Page 3

dusio · 09-27-2007, 08:13 PM

Oh, real poetry... But my opinion is still the same. If you want to believe in something more than physiological excitement and so on, it's your choice, I would say nothing about it. Nothing at all.

voyageur · 10-20-2007, 02:54 PM

It's NOT a choice. It's deep and sensual feelings and a subtle alchemy between two beings. Our "soul" meet our "the best" inside us.
Knowing his spouse in day-to-day is not knowning her by the sexual "love". Here, we are others.

psycho darko · 02-09-2008, 12:14 AM

sex is sex simple....evoltion
you gain plesure from sex so u will want to do it ergo PROCRIATION
deney it if you will but most if not all body functions you derive plesure from ergo you will want to do it its symple procriation/self presurvation

dusio · 02-12-2008, 01:32 PM

Only the TRUTH is worth something.

nikitaaa · 03-04-2008, 06:52 PM

this question can't be answered properly because everybody has his own conception of what is "normal", especially about sexual acts, which depends on everyone's education, culture, religion, moral etc.

so, in my opinion, i'd say a normal sexual act is something that a person would do and seem to him natural..for instance, if a normal sexual act is making love to your wife, and only with her, this is a normal sexual act because it depends on your NORMS. but for someone else, having several women could perfectly normal, so according to polygam's norms, this is a normal sexual act.

yet, i have a problem ^^
for instance, a pedophil who likes having sex with children : does he find his sexuality normal? yes and no... "no" because he has to hide himself, to lie because its forbidden by the law, but "yes" because for him, this is perfectly normal to be attracted by chlidren, this is something natural in his fantasms.
so where is the border of this kind of "normality"? what is the play of legacy and legillimacy in sexual acts..?

dusio · 03-04-2008, 07:38 PM

Hmm...pedophile? It's not very good example for the topic: "what is normal...", it is a deep sexual disorder which has nothing to do with normality/abnormality in "semantic sense". It is just too...polar. I think it is not what we are talking about here.

About pedophile: hmm, his/her perception of reality is just much different from what we all know. We cannot say that something which is ok but subjective, is normal just because someone has it as his/her norm. Norm should be objective as much as it can be. Only than it can be "an absolutely binding norm"...

nikitaaa · 03-04-2008, 07:50 PM

i rekon a semantic definition may be too strict in a philosophical topic : what do you mean by saying "We cannot say that something which is ok but subjective, is normal just because someone has it as his/her norm" and why do you think norms should be objective as much as they could be? maybe this is easier to reason, but is it the most relevant?

i think a broader view of the subject is necessary : discussing about what is normal or not is a bit of an improductive work : there must be as many opinions about that question as many people on earth...

09-27-2007, 08:13 PM	#15 (permalink)
dusio Only death is certain... Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in Poland Posts: 847 dusio is learning to walk	... Oh, real poetry... But my opinion is still the same. If you want to believe in something more than physiological excitement and so on, it's your choice, I would say nothing about it. Nothing at all.
(Offline)

10-20-2007, 02:54 PM	#16 (permalink)
voyageur Growing Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: France Posts: 27 voyageur is an unknown character at this point	It's NOT a choice. It's deep and sensual feelings and a subtle alchemy between two beings. Our "soul" meet our "the best" inside us. Knowing his spouse in day-to-day is not knowning her by the sexual "love". Here, we are others.
(Offline)

02-09-2008, 12:14 AM	#17 (permalink)
psycho darko Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 34 psycho darko is an unknown character at this point	sex is sex simple....evoltion you gain plesure from sex so u will want to do it ergo PROCRIATION deney it if you will but most if not all body functions you derive plesure from ergo you will want to do it its symple procriation/self presurvation __________________ http://world6.monstersgame.co.uk/?ac=vid&vid=114295570
(Offline)

02-12-2008, 01:32 PM	#18 (permalink)
dusio Only death is certain... Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in Poland Posts: 847 dusio is learning to walk	... Only the TRUTH is worth something.
(Offline)

03-04-2008, 06:52 PM	#19 (permalink)
nikitaaa Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: lyon Posts: 4 nikitaaa is an unknown character at this point	this question can't be answered properly because everybody has his own conception of what is "normal", especially about sexual acts, which depends on everyone's education, culture, religion, moral etc. so, in my opinion, i'd say a normal sexual act is something that a person would do and seem to him natural..for instance, if a normal sexual act is making love to your wife, and only with her, this is a normal sexual act because it depends on your NORMS. but for someone else, having several women could perfectly normal, so according to polygam's norms, this is a normal sexual act. yet, i have a problem ^^ for instance, a pedophil who likes having sex with children : does he find his sexuality normal? yes and no... "no" because he has to hide himself, to lie because its forbidden by the law, but "yes" because for him, this is perfectly normal to be attracted by chlidren, this is something natural in his fantasms. so where is the border of this kind of "normality"? what is the play of legacy and legillimacy in sexual acts..?
(Offline)

03-04-2008, 07:38 PM	#20 (permalink)
dusio Only death is certain... Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: I live in Poland Posts: 847 dusio is learning to walk	:) Hmm...pedophile? It's not very good example for the topic: "what is normal...", it is a deep sexual disorder which has nothing to do with normality/abnormality in "semantic sense". It is just too...polar. I think it is not what we are talking about here. About pedophile: hmm, his/her perception of reality is just much different from what we all know. We cannot say that something which is ok but subjective, is normal just because someone has it as his/her norm. Norm should be objective as much as it can be. Only than it can be "an absolutely binding norm"...
(Offline)

03-04-2008, 07:50 PM	#21 (permalink)
nikitaaa Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: lyon Posts: 4 nikitaaa is an unknown character at this point	i rekon a semantic definition may be too strict in a philosophical topic : what do you mean by saying "We cannot say that something which is ok but subjective, is normal just because someone has it as his/her norm" and why do you think norms should be objective as much as they could be? maybe this is easier to reason, but is it the most relevant? i think a broader view of the subject is necessary : discussing about what is normal or not is a bit of an improductive work : there must be as many opinions about that question as many people on earth...
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode