andidi

Si vous pouviez vérifier mon texte merci d'avance!!


To my mind guns still represented the law. So it’s normal that the only persons able to carry a weapon are the policemen. Then if everybody has one, I think that it could be the mess !! Each would adjust its accounts in his way.It’s not the goal !! Ineed, if each has a gun at home, their children can take it and creat an accident or kill someone. Futhermore for the alcoolics or depressive persons. Nowadays the policy as regards weapon evolves. Ineed given that weapons can kill, they equip the police either arms with bullets but electrical arms. These last paralyse the people who is touch with. But since then it is less dangerous?


(Biensûr) you will say me that to have a weapon at home is pratical to protect your family and your home from the intruders when the police isn’t hier. But if an intruder wants come back he will come back even you dissuade with your gun. I think that if it there are lots of problems in USA, it’s because people fool of his arm. It‘s not the weapon which is dangerous but people who have it.
I don’t mean that I’m agree with weapons as lon as it isn’t to kill a human...


To conclude I wonder why all the country don’t restrict (le port des armes).

banane82

Tu devrait supprimer ce poste, je viens d'y répondre dans un autre post.

__________________