Paul999

Could you please check if the five sentences below do not contain grammatical errrors:

The reconstituted correct reasoning should have been the following

E1-E5 correspond to pole A of duality A/~, E6 to the neutral taxon and E7-E11 to the pole ~A.

Certain authors give however a significantly different presentation from that of Johnson, by assimilating the one-sidedness fallacy to the confirmation bias.

Some other authors present this fallacy like an argument which results in mentioning only the advantages of a given object or situation, by occulting completely the corresponding disadvantages.

One can mention (without this enumeration pretending to exhaustiveness): Positive/Negative, Internal/External, Quantitative/Qualitative, Visible/Invisible, Analytic/Synthetic, Absolute/Relative, Abstract/Concrete, Static/Dynamic, Unique/Multiple, Aesthetic/Practical, Precise/Vague, Finite/Infinite, Advantage/Inconvenient, Simple/Compound, Individual/Collective, Implicit/Explicit, Voluntary/Involuntary, etc.

Many thanks.