Correction d'un texte d'anglais

lunette · 10-27-2006, 08:00 PM

Bonjour tous le monde, voila un texte que j'ai ecrit en anglais et je voudrais savoir si vous pouvez m'aider a coriger mes fautes .
merci

Over the last few years, we remarked that states worldwide tried to prevent the greenhouse effect with, for example, the Kyoto protocol (2001) where all the members tried to reduce greenhouse gases emisssions; Looking for another type of energy than fuel...
Unfortunately, it was just “ideas” which didn’t succeed....
First, USA haven't signed up the Kyoto Protocol or USA is a state where the pollution is very important.
The Protocol has less of impact without the USA.
Second, a lot of States created a new fuel( the bio ethanol) to prevent the greenhouse effect .
For example, France developed the bio ethanol which pollutes less that petrol but the manufacture is more polluting than the manufacture of petrol.
There are many examples who point out the states worldwide are doing enough to prevent the greenhouse effect.
I think that could do more such as a true recycling in the countries .
Today the problem is that the politician don’t really know how to act toward ampler of Global Warning.
Because the multiplication of natural disaste.....are forerunner of a climatic deregulation being able to harm planet
To finish, I said that we must to act for our planet and now

lunette · 10-28-2006, 06:10 PM

personne?

c'est pourtant assez important

Jessierugg · 10-29-2006, 02:08 AM

Voici quelques corrections...

Over the last few years, countries throughout the world have tried to prevent the greenhouse effect with, for example, the Kyoto protocol (2001) where all the members tried to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and by looking for an alternative energy to fuel... Unfortunately, these were just “ideas” which didn’t succeed....
First, the USA hasn’t signed the Kyoto Protocol and the USA is a country whose pollution is a big issue. The Protocol has less of impact without the USA.
Second, a lot of countries created a new fuel (bio ethanol) to prevent the greenhouse effect. For example, France developed bio ethanol, which pollutes less than petroleum. However, the manufacture of it is more polluting than the manufacture of petroleum.
There are many examples which point out that worldwide, countries are (not??) doing enough to prevent the greenhouse effect.
I think that the countries could do more, such as making an effort to recycle.
Today the problem is that the politicians don’t really know how to act toward the issue of Global Warning.
The multiplication of natural disasters is a forerunner of a climatic deregulation that could harm our planet.
In conclusion, I say that we must to act for our planet, and now.

~ Jessica

EternalSpark · 10-29-2006, 08:06 AM

Jessica did the whole work, I just have some comments ....

Quote:

I say that we must to act for our planet

This should be : I say we must act for our planet
or: I say we have to act for our planet

Quote:

I say that we must act for our planet, and now

This is correct though I think "IMHO", it would better be ..
I say that we must act for our planet immediately.

10-27-2006, 08:00 PM	#1 (permalink)
lunette Junior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9 lunette is an unknown character at this point	Correction d'un texte d'anglais Bonjour tous le monde, voila un texte que j'ai ecrit en anglais et je voudrais savoir si vous pouvez m'aider a coriger mes fautes . merci Over the last few years, we remarked that states worldwide tried to prevent the greenhouse effect with, for example, the Kyoto protocol (2001) where all the members tried to reduce greenhouse gases emisssions; Looking for another type of energy than fuel... Unfortunately, it was just “ideas” which didn’t succeed.... First, USA haven't signed up the Kyoto Protocol or USA is a state where the pollution is very important. The Protocol has less of impact without the USA. Second, a lot of States created a new fuel( the bio ethanol) to prevent the greenhouse effect . For example, France developed the bio ethanol which pollutes less that petrol but the manufacture is more polluting than the manufacture of petrol. There are many examples who point out the states worldwide are doing enough to prevent the greenhouse effect. I think that could do more such as a true recycling in the countries . Today the problem is that the politician don’t really know how to act toward ampler of Global Warning. Because the multiplication of natural disaste.....are forerunner of a climatic deregulation being able to harm planet To finish, I said that we must to act for our planet and now
(Offline)

10-28-2006, 06:10 PM	#2 (permalink)
lunette Junior Member Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 9 lunette is an unknown character at this point	personne? c'est pourtant assez important
(Offline)

10-29-2006, 02:08 AM	#3 (permalink)
Jessierugg Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Massachusetts, usa Posts: 131 Jessierugg is an unknown character at this point	Voici quelques corrections... Over the last few years, countries throughout the world have tried to prevent the greenhouse effect with, for example, the Kyoto protocol (2001) where all the members tried to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and by looking for an alternative energy to fuel... Unfortunately, these were just “ideas” which didn’t succeed.... First, the USA hasn’t signed the Kyoto Protocol and the USA is a country whose pollution is a big issue. The Protocol has less of impact without the USA. Second, a lot of countries created a new fuel (bio ethanol) to prevent the greenhouse effect. For example, France developed bio ethanol, which pollutes less than petroleum. However, the manufacture of it is more polluting than the manufacture of petroleum. There are many examples which point out that worldwide, countries are (not??) doing enough to prevent the greenhouse effect. I think that the countries could do more, such as making an effort to recycle. Today the problem is that the politicians don’t really know how to act toward the issue of Global Warning. The multiplication of natural disasters is a forerunner of a climatic deregulation that could harm our planet. In conclusion, I say that we must to act for our planet, and now. ~ Jessica
(Offline)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode