03-15-2005, 10:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
International Forum Great Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 35,992
News came out of the blue
 |
How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn?t science
In Trask's _Historical Linguistics_ there's a very illuminating discussion (pp 78-82) of changes in phonological systems, in particular of Latin rhotacization--the change from an intervocalic /s/ to intervocalic /r/. There were several stages to this change, and the change was absolutely regular: every instance of pre-Latin intervocalic /s/ became ...
http://www.joshuamacy.com/wordpress/index.php?p=70
__________________
Please comment the news by answering to it here, merci de commenter les nouvelles en les commentant ici. |
| (Offline) |
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn?t science | News | Logomacy | 0 | 02-23-2005 07:01 PM |
| How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn?t science | News | Logomacy | 0 | 02-03-2005 04:00 PM |
|
Logomacy : The international discussion forum : How Historical Linguistics demonstrates that Intelligent Design isn?t science
|
