Bon voilà je n'ai corrigé que les erreurs de grammaire que j'ai repéré. Je ne me suis pas attaqué au sens ou aux idées, bien que cela me paraisse obscure dans certains passages...
Rules...here is a theme which is worth being debated in my opinion. In spite of the bad opinion that we accord to justice, could we do without it ()? And why such a rejection of what is fair? Maybe because it restrains us in our freedom whether it's a matter of life rules or safety rules.
Certain rules often derive from laws, they're approved by justice then. It means we should respect them as well.
Otherwise, it would be the principle of "the strongest's law" (la G voulu dire la loi du+fort peut être most powerful law) which would dominate. Well, but in that case, there wouldn't be power anymore because there will always be a stronger man to dominate, following another one and so forth... And to my mind, an unstable power is not a power. So, in order to avoid that, everybody, citizens or not is duty-bound to submit (have to bear à la place, plus simple à mon avis et plus clair) to some rules to permit thento get everybody "on the same step of equality" Whether we like it or not, rules are an integral part of our life.
I think rules can sometimes () guarantee () our security. they show us the behaviour to adopt in certain situations.
Indeed, they guide people who stray from the point toward the right way.
However, as far as I'm concerned I feel that () few () rules are abolutely insane !
|