The international discussion forum - View Single Post

andidi · 01-02-2008, 02:23 PM

Bonjour!!
Quelqu'un pourrai me corriger mes fautes s'il vous plait! merci d'avance et bonne année!!

To my mind guns are still represented the law. So it’s normal that the only persons fitnesses to be carried a weapon are the policemen. Then if everyboby has one, I think it should be the mess !! Each would adjust its accounts in his way. Last but not least. Ineed, if each has a gun at home, their children can take it and creat an accident or kill someone. Futhermore for the alcoolics or depressive persons. Nowadays the policy opposite weapon evolves. Ineed given that weapon can kill, they equip the police either in bullets arms but electrical arms. These last paralyse the affected persons. But since then it is less dangerous?

Biensur you will say me that to have a weapon at home is pratical to protect your family and your home when the police is not hier from the intruders. But if an intruder wants come back he will come back even you dissuade with your gun. I think that if it there are lots of problems in USA, it’s because people fool of his arm. It‘s not the weapon which is dangerous but people which it have.
I don’t mean that I’m agree with weapons as lon as it isnt to kill a human...

To conclude I wonder why all the country don’t restrict (le port des armes).

01-02-2008, 02:23 PM	#1 (permalink)
andidi Growing Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 19 andidi is an unknown character at this point	correction traduction Bonjour!! Quelqu'un pourrai me corriger mes fautes s'il vous plait! merci d'avance et bonne année!! To my mind guns are still represented the law. So it’s normal that the only persons fitnesses to be carried a weapon are the policemen. Then if everyboby has one, I think it should be the mess !! Each would adjust its accounts in his way. Last but not least. Ineed, if each has a gun at home, their children can take it and creat an accident or kill someone. Futhermore for the alcoolics or depressive persons. Nowadays the policy opposite weapon evolves. Ineed given that weapon can kill, they equip the police either in bullets arms but electrical arms. These last paralyse the affected persons. But since then it is less dangerous? Biensur you will say me that to have a weapon at home is pratical to protect your family and your home when the police is not hier from the intruders. But if an intruder wants come back he will come back even you dissuade with your gun. I think that if it there are lots of problems in USA, it’s because people fool of his arm. It‘s not the weapon which is dangerous but people which it have. I don’t mean that I’m agree with weapons as lon as it isnt to kill a human... To conclude I wonder why all the country don’t restrict (le port des armes).
(Offline)